Treatment of ischemia

ABSTRACT

A system, including methods and compositions, for treatment of ischemia.

This application is a continuation application of U.S. patentapplication Ser. No. 15/638,655, filed Jun. 30, 2017, which is acontinuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/284,166,filed Oct. 28, 2011, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,745,356, which claims priorityto U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/724,859, filed Mar. 16, 2007, nowU.S. Pat. No. 8,076,450, which is a continuation of PCT/US2005/033171filed Sep. 16, 2005, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional PatentApplication No. 60/611,241, filed Sep. 16, 2004. The entirety of all ofthe aforementioned applications is incorporated herein by reference.

GOVERNMENT LICENSE RIGHTS

This application was made with U.S. Government support under grant fromthe National Institutes of Health. The U.S. Government thus may havecertain license rights in this invention.

FIELD

The present application generally relates to methods and compositionsfor treatment of ischemia, which may include approaches for reducinginjury resulting from ischemia and/or for identifying drugs for ischemiatreatment, in particular, by selectively inhibiting one or more membersof the acid sensing ion channel (ASIC) family.

BACKGROUND

Strokes may be caused by a disruption of blood flow to the brain, forexample, due to a clot or a leak in a blood vessel that supplies thebrain with blood. This disruption of blood flow deprives brain tissue ofoxygen, often resulting in localized death of brain tissue (focalinfarction) and thus pennranent damage to the brain.

Changes in the ion flux into neurons may lead to the cell death producedby stroke. Accordingly, various ion channels may be candidates formediating this altered ion flux, thus confounding the search for asuitable therapeutic target.

SUMMARY

The present teachings provide a system, including methods andcompositions, for treatment of ischemia.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a view of a flowchart illustrating an exemplary method oftreating ischemia, in accordance with aspects of the present teachings.

FIG. 2 is a view of a flowchart illustrating an exemplary method ofidentifying drugs for treating ischemia, in accordance with aspects ofthe present teachings.

FIGS. 3A-3D is a series of graphs presenting exemplary data related tothe electrophysiology and pharmacology of acid sensing ion channel(ASIC) proteins in cultured mouse cortical neurons, in accordance withaspects of the present teachings.

FIGS. 4A-4D is an additional series of graphs presenting exemplary datarelated to the electrophysiology and pharmacology of ASIC proteins incultured mouse cortical neurons, in accordance with aspects of thepresent teachings.

FIGS. 5A-5D is a set of graphs and traces presenting exemplary datashowing that modeled ischemia may enhance activity of ASIC proteins, inaccordance with aspects of the present teachings.

FIGS. 6A-6B and 7A-7D are a set of graphs and traces presentingexemplary data showing that ASIC proteins in cortical neurons may beCa2+ permeable, and that Ca2+ permeability may be ASIC1a dependent, inaccordance with aspects of the present teachings.

FIGS. 8A-8C is a series of graphs presenting exemplary data showing thatacid incubation may induce glutamate receptor-independent neuronalinjury that is protected by ASIC blockade, in accordance with aspects ofthe present teachings.

FIGS. 9A-9D is a series of graphs presenting exemplary data showing thatASIC1a may be involved in acid-induced injury in vitro, in accordancewith aspects of the present teachings.

FIGS. 10A-10D is a series of graphs with data showing neuroprotection inbrain ischemia in vivo by ASIC1a blockade and by ASIC1 gene knockout, inaccordance with aspects of the present teachings.

FIG. 11 is a graph plotting exemplary data for the percentage ofischemic damage produced by stroke in an animal model system as afunction of the time and type of treatment, in accordance with aspectsof the present teachings.

FIG. 12 is a view of the primary amino acid sequence of an exemplarycystine knot peptide, PcTx1, with various exemplary peptide featuresshown, in accordance with aspects of the present teachings.

FIG. 13 is a comparative view of the cystine knot peptide of FIG. 12aligned with various exemplary deletion derivatives of the peptide, inaccordance with aspects of the present teachings. FIG. 14 is anexemplary graph plotting the amplitude of calcium current measured incells as a function of the ASIC family member(s) expressed in the cells,in accordance with aspects of the present teachings. FIG. 15 is a graphpresenting exemplary data related to the efficacy of nasallyadministered PcTx venom in reducing ischemic injury in an animal modelsystem, in accordance with aspects of the present teachings.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The present teachings provide a system, including methods andcompositions, for treatment of ischemia. The methods may includeapproaches for reducing injury resulting from ischemia and/or foridentifying drugs for ischemia treatment. The methods selectively mayinhibit one or more members of the acid sensing ion channel (ASIC)family, to provide a targeted therapy for ischemia treatment.

FIG. 1 shows a flowchart 20 with exemplary steps 22, 24 that may beperformed in a method of treating ischemia. The steps may be performedany suitable number of times and in any suitable combination. In themethod, an ischemic subject (or subjects) may be selected for treatment,indicated at 22. An ASIC-selective inhibitor then may be administered tothe ischemic subject(s), indicated at 24. Administration of theinhibitor to the ischemic subject may be in a therapeutically effectamount, to reduce ischemia-induced injury to the subject, for example,reducing the amount of brain damage resulting from a stroke.

A potential explanation for the efficacy of the ischemia treatment ofFIG. 1 may be offered by the data of the present teachings (e.g., seeExample 1). In particular, the damaging effects of ischemia may not beequal to acidosis, that is, acidification of tissue/cells via ischemiamay not be sufficient to produce ischemia-induced injury. Instead,ischemia-induced injury may be caused, in many cases, by calcium fluxinto cells mediated by a member(s) of the ASIC family, particularlyASIC1a. Accordingly, selective inhibition of the channel activity ofASIC1a may reduce this harmful calcium flux, thereby reducingischemia-induced injury.

FIG. 2 shows a flowchart 30 with exemplary steps 32, 34 that may beperformed in a method of identifying drugs for treatment of ischemia.The steps may be performed any suitable number of times and in anysuitable combination. In the method, one or more ASIC-selectiveinhibitors may be obtained, indicated at 32. The inhibitors then may betested on an ischemic subject for an effect on ischemia-induced injury,indicated at 34.

The methods of the present teachings may provide one or more advantagesover other methods of ischemia treatment. These advantages may include(1) less ischemia-induced injury, (2) fewer side effects of treatment(e.g., due to selection of a more specific therapeutic target), and/or(3) a longer time window for effective treatment, among others.

Further aspects of the present teachings are described in the followingsections, including (I) ischemia, (II) ischemic subjects and subjectselection, (III) ASIC inhibitors, (IV) administration of inhibitors, (V)identification of drugs, and (VI) examples.

I. ISCHEMIA

The system of the present teachings is directed to treatment of anysuitable ischemia. Ischemia, as used herein, is a reduced blood flow toan organ(s) and/or tissue(s). The reduced blood flow may be caused byany suitable mechanism including a partial or complete blockage (anobstruction), a narrowing (a constriction), and/or a leak/rupture, amongothers, of one or more blood vessels that supply blood to the organ(s)and/or tissue(s). Accordingly, ischemia may be created by thrombosis, anembolism, atherosclerosis, hypertension, hemorrhage, an aneurysm,surgery, trauma, medication, and/or the like. The reduced blood flowthus may be chronic, transient, acute, sporadic, and/or the like.

Any suitable organ or tissue may experience a reduced blood flow in theischemia being treated. Exemplary organs and/or tissues may include thebrain, arteries, the heart, intestines, the eye (e.g., the optic nerve),etc. Ischemia-induced injury (i.e., disease and/or damage) produced byvarious ischemias may include ischemic myelopathy, ischemic opticneuropathy, ischemic colitis, coronary heart disease, and/or cardiacheart disease (e.g., angina, heart attack, etc.), among others.Ischemia-induced injury thus may damage and/or kill cells and/or tissue,for example, producing necrotic (infarcted) tissue, inflammation, and/ortissue remodeling, among others, at affected sites within the body.Treatment according to aspects of the present teachings may reduce theincidence, extent, and/or severity of this injury.

The system of the present teachings may provide treatment of stroke.Stroke, as used herein, is brain ischemia produced by a reduced bloodsupply to a part (or all) of the brain. Symptoms produced by stroke maybe sudden (such as loss of consciousness) or may have a gradual onsetover hours or days. Furthermore, the stroke may be a major ischemicattack (a full stroke) or a more minor, transient ischemic attack, amongothers. Symptoms produced by stroke may include, for example,hemiparesis, hemiplegia, one-sided numbness, one-sided weakness,one-sided paralysis, temporary limb weakness, limb tingling, confusion,trouble speaking, trouble understanding speech, trouble seeing in one orboth eyes, dim vision, loss of vision, trouble walking, dizziness, atendency to fall, loss of coordination, sudden severe headache, noisybreathing, and/or loss of consciousness. Alternatively, or in addition,the symptoms may be detectable more readily or only via tests and/orinstruments, for example, an ischemia blood test (e.g., to test foraltered albumin, particular protein isoforms, damaged proteins, etc.),an electrocardiogram, an electroencephalogram, an exercise stress test,and/or the like.

II. ISCHEMIC SUBJECTS AND SUBJECT SELECTION

The system of the present teachings may provide treatment of ischemicsubjects to reduce ischemic injury to the subjects. An ischemic subject,as used herein, is any person (a human subject) or animal (an animalsubject) that has ischemia, an ischemia-related condition, a history ofischemia, and/or a significant chance of developing ischemia aftertreatment begins and during a time period in which the treatment isstill effective.

The ischemic subject may be an animal. The term “animal,” as usedherein, refers to any animal that is not human. Exemplary animals thatmay be suitable include any animal with a bloodstream, such as rodents(mice, rats, etc.), dogs, cats, birds, sheep, goats, non-human primates,etc. The animal may be treated for its own sake, e.g., for veterinarypurposes (such as treatment of a pet). Alternatively, the animal mayprovide an animal model of ischemia, to facilitate testing drugcandidates for human use, such as to determine the candidates' potency,window of effectiveness, side effects, etc. Further aspects of testingperformed with animal model systems are described below in Section V.

An ischemia-related condition may be any consequence of ischemia. Theconsequence may be substantially concurrent with the onset ischemia(e.g., a direct effect of the ischemia) and/or may occur substantiallyafter ischemia onset and/or even after the ischemia is over (e.g., anindirect, downstream effect of the ischemia, such reperfusion of tissuewhen ischemia ends). Exemplary ischemia-related conditions may includeany combination of the symptoms (and/or conditions) listed above inSection I. Alternatively, or in addition, the symptoms may include localand/or systemic acidosis (pH decrease), hypoxia (oxygen decrease), freeradical generation, and/or the like.

Ischemic subjects for treatment may be selected by any suitablecriteria. Exemplary criteria may include any detectable symptoms ofischemia, a history of ischemia, an event that increases the risk of (orinduces) ischemia (such as a surgical procedure, trauma, administrationof a medication, etc.), and/or the like. A history of ischemia mayinvolve one or more prior ischemic episodes. In some examples, a subjectselected for treatment may have had an onset of ischemia that occurredat least about one, two, or three hours before treatment begins, or aplurality of ischemic episodes (such as transient ischemic attacks) thatoccurred less than about one day, twelve hours, or six hours prior toinitiation of treatment.

III. ASIC INHIBITORS

Inhibitors of ASIC family members, as used herein, are substances thatreduce (partially, substantially, or completely block) the activity orone or more members of the ASIC family, that is, ASIC1a, ASIC1b, ASIC2a,ASIC2b, ASIC3, and ASIC4, among others. In some examples, the inhibitorsmay reduce the channel activity of one or more members, such as theability of the members to flux ions (e.g., sodium, calcium, and/orpotassium ions, among others) through cell membranes (into and/or out ofcells). The substances may be compounds (small molecules of less thanabout 10 kDa, peptides, nucleic acids, lipids, etc.), complexes of twoor more compounds, and/or mixtures, among others. Furthermore, thesubstances may inhibit ASIC family members by any suitable mechanismincluding competitive, noncompetitive, uncompetitive, and/or mixedinhibition, among others.

The inhibitor may be an ASIC1a inhibitor that inhibits acid sensing ionchannel 1a (ASIC1a). ASIC1a, as used herein, refers to an ASIC1a proteinor channel from any species. For example, an exemplary human ASIC1aprotein/channel is described in Waldmann, R., et al. 1997, Nature 386,pp. 173-177, which is incorporated herein by reference.

The expression “ASIC1a inhibitor” may refer to a product which, withinthe scope of sound pharmacological judgment, is potentially or actuallypharmaceutically useful as an inhibitor of ASIC1a, and includesreference to substances which comprise a pharmaceutically active speciesand are described, promoted, or authorized as an ASIC1a inhibitor.

An ASIC1a inhibitor may be selective within the ASIC family. Selectiveinhibition of ASIC1a, as used herein, is inhibition that issubstantially stronger on ASIC1a than on another ASIC family member(s)when compared (for example, in cultured cells) after exposure of each tothe same (sub-maximal) concentration(s) of an inhibitor. The inhibitormay inhibit ASIC1a selectively relative to at least one other ASICfamily member (ASIC1b, ASIC2a, ASIC2b, ASIC3, ASIC 4, etc.) and/orselectively relative to every other ASIC family member. The strength ofinhibition for a selective inhibitor may be described by an inhibitorconcentration at which inhibition occurs (e.g., an IC.sub.50 (inhibitorconcentration that produces 50% of maximal inhibition) or a K.sub.ivalue (inhibition constant or dissociation constant)) relative todifferent ASIC family members. An ASIC1a-selective inhibitor may inhibitASIC1a activity at a concentration that is at least about two-, four-,or ten-fold lower (one-half, one-fourth, or one-tenth the concentrationor lower) than for inhibition of at least one other or of every otherASIC family member. Accordingly, an ASIC1a-selective inhibitor may havean IC.sub.50 and/or K.sub.i for ASIC1a inhibition that is at least abouttwo-, four-, or ten-fold lower (one-half, one-fourth, or one-tenth orless) than for inhibition of at least one other ASIC family memberand/or for inhibition of every other ASIC family member.

An ASIC1a-selective inhibitor, in addition to being selective, also maybe specific for ASIC1a. ASIC1a-specific inhibition, as used herein, isinhibition that is substantially exclusive to ASIC1a relative to everyother ASIC family member. An ASIC1a-specific inhibitor may inhibitASIC1a at an inhibitor concentration that is at least about twenty-foldlower (5% of the concentration or less) than for inhibition of everyother ASIC family member. Accordingly, an ASIC1a-specific inhibitor mayhave an IC₅₀ and/or K_(i) for ASIC1a relative to every other member ofthe ASIC family that is at least about twenty-fold lower (five percentor less), such that, for example, inhibition of other ASIC familymembers is at least substantially (or completely) undetectable.

Any suitable ASIC inhibitor or combination of inhibitors may be used.For example, a subject may be treated with an ASIC1a-selective inhibitorand a nonselective ASIC inhibitor, or with an ASIC1a-selective inhibitorand an inhibitor to a non-ASIC channel protein, such as a non-ASICcalcium channel. In some examples, a subject may be treated with anASIC1a-selective inhibitor and an inhibitor of NMDA receptors, such as aglutamate antagonist.

The inhibitor may be or include a peptide. The peptide may have anysuitable number of amino acid subunits, generally at least about ten andless than about one-thousand subunits. In some examples, the peptide mayhave a cystine knot motif. A cystine knot, as used herein, generallycomprises an arrangement of six or more cysteines. A peptide with thesecysteines may create a “knot” including (1) a ring formed by twodisulfide bonds and their connecting backbone segments, and (2) a thirddisulfide bond that threads through the ring. In some examples, thepeptide may be a conotoxin from an arachnid and/or cone snail species.For example, the peptide may be PcTx1 (psalmotoxin 1), a toxin from atarantula (Psalmopoeus cambridgei (Pc)).

In some examples, the peptide may be structurally related to PcTx1, suchthat the peptide and PcTx1 differ by at least one deletion, insertion,and/or substitution of one or more amino acids. For example, the peptidemay have at least about 25% or at least about 50% sequence identity,and/or at least about 25% or at least about 50% sequence similarity withPcTx1 (see below). Further aspects of peptides that may be suitable asinhibitors are described below in Example 3.

Methods of alignment of amino acid sequences for comparison andgeneration of identity and similarity scores are well known in the art.Exemplary alignment methods that may be suitable include (Best Fit) ofSmith and Waterman, a homology alignment algorithm (GAP) of Needlemanand Wunsch, a similarity method (Tfasta and Fasta) of Pearson andLipman, and/or the like. Computer algorithms of these and otherapproaches that may be suitable include, but are not limited to:CLUSTAL, GAP, BESTFIT, BLASTP, FASTA, and TFASTA.

As used herein, “sequence identity” or “identity” in the context of twopeptides relates to the percentage of residues in the correspondingpeptide sequences that are the same when aligned for maximumcorrespondence. In some examples, peptide residue positions that are notidentical may differ by conservative amino acid substitutions, whereamino acid residues are substituted for other amino acid residues withsimilar chemical properties (e.g. charge or hydrophobicity) andtherefore are expected to produce a smaller (or no) effect on thefunctional properties of the molecule. Where sequences differ inconservative substitutions, the percent sequence identity may beadjusted upwards, to give a “similarity” of the sequences, whichcorrects for the conservative nature of the substitutions. For example,each conservative substitution may be scored as a partial rather than afull mismatch, thereby correcting the percentage sequence identity toprovide a similarity score. The scoring of conservative substitutions toobtain similarity scores is well known in the art and may be calculatedby any suitable approach, for example, according to the algorithm ofMeyers and Miller, Computer Applic. Biol Sci., 4: 11-17 (1988), e.g., asimplemented in the program PC/GENE (Intelligenetics, Mountain View,Calif., USA).

IV. ADMINISTRATION OF INHIBITORS

Administration (or administering), as used herein, includes any route ofsubject exposure to an inhibitor, under any suitable conditions, and atany suitable time(s). Administration may be self-administration oradministration by another, such as a health-care practitioner (e.g., adoctor, a nurse, etc.). Administration may be by injection (e.g.,intravenous, intramuscular, subcutaneous, intracerebral, epidural,and/or intrathecal, among others), ingestion (e.g., using a capsule,lozenge, a fluid composition, etc.), inhalation (e.g., an aerosol (lessthan about 10 microns average droplet diameter) inhaled nasally and/ororally), absorption through the skin (e.g., with a skin patch) and/ormucosally (e.g., through oral, nasal, and/or pulmonary mucosa, amongothers), and/or the like. Mucosal administration may be achieved, forexample, using a spray (such as a nasal spray), an aerosol that isinhaled), and/or the like. A spray may be a surface spray (droplets onaverage greater than about 50 microns in diameter) and/or a space spray(droplets on average about 10-50 microns in diameter). In some examples,ischemia may produce an alteration of the blood-brain barrier of anischemic subject, thus increasing the efficiency with which an inhibitorthat is introduced (e.g., by injection and/or absorption) into thebloodstream of a subject can reach the brain. Administration may beperformed once or a plurality of times, and at any suitable timerelative to ischemia diagnosis, to provide treatment. Accordingly,administration may be performed before ischemia has been detected (e.g.,prophylactically,) after a minor ischemic episode, during chronicischemia, after a full stroke, and/or the like.

A therapeutically effective amount of an inhibitor may be administered.A therapeutically effective amount of an inhibitor, as used herein, isany amount of the inhibitor that, when administered to subjects,reduces, in a significant number of the subjects, the degree, incidence,and/or extent of ischemia-induced injury in the subjects. Accordingly, atherapeutically effective amount may be determined, for example, inclinical studies in which various amounts of the inhibitor areadministered to test subjects (and, generally, compared to a controlgroup of subjects).

The inhibitor may be administered in any suitable form and in anysuitable composition to subjects. In some examples, the inhibitor may beconfigured as a pharmaceutically acceptable salt. The composition may beformulated to include, for example, a fluid carrier/solvent (a vehicle),a preservative, one or more excipients, a coloring agent, a flavoringagent, a salt(s), an anti-foaming agent, and/or the like. The inhibitormay be present at a concentration in the vehicle that provides atherapeutically effective amount of the inhibitor for treatment ofischemia when administered to an ischemic subject.

V. IDENTIFICATION OF DRUGS

Additional ASIC inhibitors may be identified for use as drugs to treatischemia. Identification may include (A) obtaining one or more ASICinhibitors, and (B) testing the ASIC inhibitors on ischemic subjects.

A. Obtaining ASIC Inhibitors

One or more ASIC inhibitors, particularly ASIC1a inhibitors as describedabove, may be obtained. The inhibitors may be obtained by any suitableapproach, such by screening a set of candidate inhibitors (e.g., alibrary of two or more compounds) and/or by rationale design, amongothers.

Screening may involve any suitable assay system that measuresinteraction between ASIC proteins and the set of candidate inhibitors.Exemplary assay systems may include assays performed biochemically(e.g., binding assays), with cells grown in culture (“cultured cells”),and/or with organisms, among others.

A cell-based assay system may measure an effect, if any, of eachcandidate inhibitor on ion flux in the cells, generally acid-sensitiveion flux. In some examples, the ion flux may be a flux of calcium and/orsodium, among others. The assay system may use cells expressing an ASICfamily member, such as ASIC1a, or two or more distinct sets of cellsexpressing two or more distinct ASIC family members, such as ASIC1a andanother ASIC family member(s), to determine the selectivity of eachinhibitor for these family members. The cells may express each ASICfamily member endogenously or through introduction of foreign nucleicacid. In some examples, the assay system may measure ion fluxelectrophysiologically (such as by patch clamp), using an ion-sensitiveor membrane potential-sensitive dye (e.g., a calcium sensitive dye suchas Fura-2), or via a gene-based reporter system that is sensitive tochanges in membrane potential and/or intracellular ion (e.g., calcium)concentrations, among others. The assay system may be used to testcandidate inhibitors for selective and/or specific inhibition of ASICfamily members, particularly ASIC1a.

B. Testing ASIC Inhibitors on Subjects

One or more ASIC inhibitors may be administered to an ischemicsubject(s) to test the efficacy of the inhibitors for treatment ofischemia. The ischemic subjects may be people or animals. In someexamples, the ischemic subjects may provide an animal model system ofischemia and/or stroke. Exemplary animal model systems include rodents(mice and/or rats, among others) with ischemia induced experimentally.The ischemia may be induced mechanically (e.g., surgically) and/or byadministration of a drug, among others. In some examples, the ischemiamay be induced by occlusion of a blood vessel, such as by constrictionof a mid-cerebral artery.

VI. EXAMPLES

The following examples describes selected aspects and embodiments of thepresent teachings, particularly data describing in vitro and in vivoeffects of ASIC inhibition, and exemplary cystine knot peptides for useas inhibitors. These examples are intended for the purposes ofillustration and should not be construed to limit the scope of thepresent teachings.

Example 1

Neuroprotection in Ischemia Blocking Calcium-Permeable Acid-Sensing IonChannels

This example describes experiments showing a role of ASIC1a in mediatingischemic injury and the ability ASIC1a inhibitors to reduce ischemicinjury; see FIGS. 2-10.

Overview

Ca²+ toxicity may play a central role in ischemic brain injury. Themechanism by which toxic Ca²+ loading of cells occurs in the ischemicbrain has become less clear as multiple human trials of glutamateantagonists have failed to show effective neuroprotection in stroke.Acidosis may be a common feature of ischemia and may play a criticalrole in brain injury; however, the mechanism(s) remains ill defined.Here, we show that acidosis may activate Ca²+-permeable acid-sensing ionchannels (ASICs), which may induce glutamate receptor-independent,Ca²+-dependent, neuronal injury inhibited by ASIC blockers. Cellslacking endogenous ASICs may be resistant to acid injury, whiletransfection of Ca2+-permeable ASIC1a may establish sensitivity. Infocal ischemia, intracerebroventricular injection of ASIC1a blockers orknockout of the ASIC1a gene may protect the brain from ischemic injuryand may do so more potently than glutamate antagonism. Thus, acidosismay injure the brain via membrane receptor-based mechanisms withresultant toxicity of [Ca²+] (intracellular calcium), disclosing newpotential therapeutic targets for stroke.

B. Introduction

Intracellular Ca²+ overload may be important for neuronal injuryassociated with neuropathological syndromes, including brain ischemia(Choi 1995 and Choi 1988a). Excessive Ca²+ in the cell may activate acascade of cytotoxic events leading to activation of enzymes that breakdown proteins, lipids, and nucleic acids. NMDA receptors, which may bethe most important excitatory neurotransmitter receptors in the centralnervous system (McLennan 1983 and Dingledine et al. 1999), have longbeen considered the main target responsible for Ca²+ overload in theischemic brain (Simon et al. 1984; Rothman and Olney 1986; Choi 1988band Meldrum 1995). However, recent clinical efforts to prevent braininjury through the therapeutic use of NMDA receptor antagonists havebeen disappointing (Lee et al. 1999 and Wahlgren and Ahmed 2004).Although multiple factors, including difficulty in early initiation oftreatment, may have contributed to trial failures, glutamatereceptor-independent Ca²+ toxicity also or alternatively may beresponsible for ischemic brain injury.

The normal brain may require complete oxidation of glucose to fulfillits energy requirements. During ischemia, oxygen depletion may force thebrain to switch to anaerobic glycolysis. Accumulation of lactic acid asa byproduct of glycolysis and protons produced by ATP hydrolysis maycause pH to fall in the ischemic brain (Rehncrona 1985 and Siesjo et al.1996). Consequently, tissue pH typically falls to 6.5-6.0 duringischemia under normoglycemic conditions and may fall below 6.0 duringsevere ischemia or under hyperglycemic conditions (Nedergaard et al.1991; Rehncrona 1985 and Siesjo et al. 1996). Nearly all in vivo studiesindicate that acidosis aggravates ischemic brain injury (Tombaugh andSapolsky 1993 and Siesjo et al. 1996). However, the mechanisms of thisprocess remain unclear, although a host of possibilities has beensuggested (Siesjo et al. 1996; McDonald et al. 1998; Swanson et al. 1995and Ying et al. 1999).

Acid-sensing ion channels (ASICs), a newly described class ofligand-gated channels (Waldmann et al. 1997a and Krishtal 2003), havebeen shown to be expressed throughout neurons of mammalian central andperipheral nervous systems (Waldmann et al. 1997a; Waldmann et al. 1999;Waldmann and Lazdunski 1998; Krishtal 2003; Alvarez de la Rosa et al.2002 and Alvarez de la Rosa et al. 2003). These channels are members ofthe degenerin/epithelial sodium channel (Deg/ENaC) superfamily (Benosand Stanton 1999; Bianchi and Driscoll 2002 and Krishtal 2003).Pertinent to ischemia, ASICs also may flux Ca²+ (Waldmann et al. 1997a;Chu et al. 2002 and Yermolaieva et al. 2004).

To date, six ASIC subunits have been cloned. Four of these subunits mayform functional homomultimeric channels that are activated by acidic pHto conduct a sodium-selective, amiloride-sensitive, cation current. ThepH of half-maximal activation (pH_(0.5)) of these channels differs:ASIC1a, pH_(0.5)=6.2 (Waldmann et al., 1997a); ASIC1.beta. (also termedASIC1b), a splice variant of ASIC1a with a unique N-terminal,pH_(0.5)=5.9 (Chen et al., 1998); ASIC2a, pH_(0.5)=4.4 (Waldmann et al.,1999); and ASIC3, pH_(0.5)=6.5 (Waldmann et al., 1997b). Neither ASIC2bnor ASIC4 can form functional homomeric channel (Akopian et al. 2000;Grunder et al. 2000 and Lingueglia et al. 1997), but ASIC2b has beenshown to associate with other subunits and modulate their activity(Lingueglia et al., 1997). In addition to Na.sup.+ permeability,homomeric ASIC1a may flux Ca²+ (Waldmann et al. 1997a; Chu et al. 2002and Yermolaieva et al. 2004). Although the exact subunit composition ofASICs in native neurons has not been determined, both ASIC1a and ASIC2asubunits have been shown to be abundant in the brain (Price et al. 1996;Bassilana et al. 1997; Wemmie et al. 2002 and Alvarez de la Rosa et al.2003).

Detailed functions of ASICs in both peripheral and central nervoussystems remain to be determined. In peripheral sensory neurons, ASICshave been implicated in mechanosensation (Price et al. 2000 and Price etal. 2001) and perception of pain during tissue acidosis (Bevan and Yeats1991; Krishtal and Pidoplichko 1981; Ugawa et al. 2002; Sluka et al.2003 and Chen et al. 2002), particularly in ischemic myocardium whereASICs likely transduce anginal pain (Benson et al., 1999). The presenceof ASICs in the brain, which lacks nociceptors, suggests that thesechannels may have functions beyond nociception. Indeed, recent studieshave indicated that ASIC1a may be involved in synaptic plasticity,learning/memory, and fear conditioning (Wemmie et al. 2002 and Wemmie etal. 2003). Here, using a combination of patch-clamp recording, Ca²+imaging, receptor subunit transfection, in vitro cell toxicity assays,and in vivo ischemia models combined with gene knockout, we demonstrateactivation of Ca²+-permeable ASIC1a as largely responsible forglutamate-independent, acidosis-mediated, and ischemic brain injury.

C. Results Acidosis Activates ASICs in Mouse Cortical Neurons

FIGS. 3 and 4 shows exemplary data related to the electrophysiology andpharmacology of ASICs in cultured mouse cortical neurons. FIGS. 3A and3B are graphs illustrating the pH dependence of ASIC currents activatedby a pH drop from 7.4 to the pH values indicated. Dose-response curveswere fit to the Hill equation with an average pH_(0.5) of 6.18±0.06(n=10). FIGS. 3C and 3D are graphs illustrating the current-voltagerelationship of ASICs (n=5). The amplitudes of ASIC current at variousvoltages were normalized to that recorded at −60 mV. FIGS. 4A and 4B aregraphs illustrating a dose-dependent blockade of ASIC currents byamiloride. IC₅₀=16.4±4.1 μM, N=8. FIGS. 4C and 4D are graphsillustrating a blockade of ASIC currents by PcTX venom. **p<0.01.

We first recorded ASIC currents in cultured mouse cortical neurons, apreparation commonly used for cell toxicity studies (Koh and Choi 1987and Sattler et al. 1999); see FIG. 3. At a holding potential of −60 mV,a rapid reduction of extracellular pH (pHe) to below 7.0 evoked largetransient inward currents with a small steady-state component in themajority of neurons (FIG. 3A). The amplitude of inward current increasedin a sigmoidal fashion as pHe decreased, yielding a pH0.5 of 6.18±0.06(n=10, FIG. 3B). A linear I-V relationship and a reversal close to theNa+ equilibrium potential were obtained (n=6, FIGS. 3C and 3D). Thesedata demonstrate that lowering pHe may activate typical ASICs in mousecortical neurons.

We then tested the effect of amiloride, a nonspecific blocker of ASICs(Waldmann et al., 1997a), on the acid-activated currents; see FIG. 4.Similar to previous studies, mainly in sensory neurons (Waldmann et al.1997a; Benson et al. 1999; Chen et al. 1998 and Varming 1999), amiloridedose-dependently blocked ASIC currents in cortical neurons with an IC50of 16.4±4.1 μM (n=8, FIGS. 4A and 4B). Psalmotoxin 1 (or PcTX1) fromvenom of the tarantula Psalmopoeus cambridgei (PcTX venom) may be aspecific ASIC1a blocker (Escoubas et al., 2000). Our studies show that,at a protein concentration of 25 ng/mL, PcTX venom itself may block thecurrent mediated by homomeric ASIC1a expressed in COS-7 cells by ˜70%(n=4, see Supplemental Figure S1 atwww.cell.com/cgi/content/full/118/6/687/DC1, which is incorporatedherein by reference). However, it does not affect currents mediated byheteromeric ASIC1a/2a, homomeric ASIC2a, or ASIC3 channels at 500 ng/mL(n=4-6). In addition, at 500 ng/mL, PcTX venom does not affect thecurrents through known voltage- and ligand-gated channels, furtherindicating its specificity for homomeric ASIC1a (n=4-5, SupplementalFigure S2, and Supplemental Data (at the website cited above), which areincorporated herein by reference).

We then tested the effect of PcTX venom on acid-activated current incortical neurons. At 100 ng/mL, PcTX venom reversibly blocked the peakamplitude of ASIC current by 47%±7% (n=15, FIGS. 4C and 4D), indicatingsignificant contributions of homomeric ASIC1a to total acid-activatedcurrents. Increasing PcTX concentration did not induce further reductionin the amplitude of ASIC current in the majority of cortical neurons(n=8, data not shown), indicating coexistence of PcTX-insensitive ASICs(e.g., heteromeric ASIC1a/2a) in these neurons.

2. ASIC Response is Potentiated by Modeled Ischemia

FIG. 5 shows exemplary data indicating that modeled ischemia may enhanceactivity of ASICs. FIG. 5A is a series of exemplary traces showing anincrease in amplitude and a decrease in desensitization of ASIC currentsfollowing 1 hr OGD. FIG. 5B is a graph of summary data illustrating anincrease of ASIC current amplitude in OGD neurons. N=40 and 44, *p<0.05.FIG. 5C is a series of exemplary traces and summary data showingdecreased ASIC current desensitization in OGD neurons. N=6, **p<0.01.FIG. 5D is a pair of exemplary traces showing lack of acid-activatedcurrent at pH 6.0 in ASIC1^(−/−) neurons, in control condition, andfollowing 1 hr OGD (n=12 and 13).

Since acidosis may be a central feature of brain ischemia, we determinedwhether ASICs may be activated in ischemic conditions and whetherischemia may modify the properties of these channels; see FIG. 5. Werecorded ASIC currents in neurons following 1 hr oxygen glucosedeprivation (OGD), a common model of in vitro ischemia (Goldberg andChoi, 1993). One set of cultures was washed three times withglucose-free extracellular fluid (ECF) and subjected to OGD, whilecontrol cultures were subjected to washes with glucose containing ECFand incubation in a conventional cell culture incubator. OGD wasterminated after 1 hr by replacing glucose-free ECF with Neurobasalmedium and incubating cultures in the conventional incubator. ASICcurrent was then recorded 1 hr following the OGD when there was nomorphological alteration of neurons. OGD treatment induced a moderateincrease of the amplitude of ASIC currents (1520±138 pA in controlgroup, N=44; 1886±185 pA in neurons following 1 hr OGD, N=40, p<0.05,FIGS. 5A and 5B). More importantly, OGD induced a dramatic decrease inASIC desensitization as demonstrated by an increase in time constant ofthe current decay (814.7±58.9 ms in control neurons, N=6; 1928.9±315.7ms in neurons following OGD, N=6, p<0.01, FIGS. 5A and 5C). In corticalneurons cultured from ASIC1−/− mice, reduction of pH from 7.4 to 6.0 didnot activate any inward current (n=52), similar to a previous study inhippocampal neurons (Wemmie et al., 2002). In these neurons, 1 hr OGDdid not activate or potentiate acid-induced responses (FIG. 5D, n=12 and13).

3. Acidosis Induces Glutamate-Independent Ca2+ Entry Via ASIC1a

FIGS. 6 and 7 show exemplary data suggesting that ASICs in CorticalNeurons may be Ca²⁺ permeable, and that Ca²⁺ permeability may be ASIC1adependent. FIG. 6A shows exemplary traces obtained with Na⁺-free ECFcontaining 10 mM Ca²⁺ as the only charge carrier. Inward currents wererecorded at pH 6.0. The average reversal potential is ˜−17 mV aftercorrection of liquid junction potential (n=5). FIG. 6B showsrepresentative traces and summary data illustrating blockade ofCa²+-mediated current by amiloride and PcTX venom. The peak amplitude ofCa²+-mediated current decreased to 26%±2% of control value by 100 μMamiloride (n=6, p<0.01) and to 22%±0.9% by 100 ng/mL PcTX venom (n=5,p<0.01). FIG. 7A shows exemplary 340/380 nm ratios as a function of pH,illustrating an increase of [Ca²+]i by pH drop to 6.0. Neurons werebathed in normal ECF containing 1.3 mM CaCl₂ with blockers forvoltage-gated Ca²⁺ channels (5 μM nimodipine and 1 μM co-conotoxinMVIIC) and glutamate receptors (10 μM MK801 and 20 μM CNQX). The insetof FIG. 7A shows exemplary inhibition of acid-induced increase of[Ca²⁺]_(i) by 100 μM amiloride. FIG. 7B shows exemplary summary dataillustrating inhibition of acid-induced increase of [Ca²+]i by amilorideand PcTX venom. N=6-8, **p<0.01 compared with pH 6.0 group. FIG. 7Cshows exemplary 340/380 nm ratios as a function of pH and NMDApresence/absence, demonstrating a lack of acid-induced increase of[Ca²⁺]_(i) in ASIC1^(−/−) neurons; neurons had a normal response to NMDA(n=8). FIG. 7D shows exemplary traces illustrating a lack ofacid-activated current at pH 6.0 in ASIC1^(−/−) neurons.

Using a standard ion-substitution protocol (Jia et al., 1996) and theFura-2 fluorescent Ca2+-imaging technique (Chu et al., 2002), wedetermined whether ASICs in cortical neurons are Ca2+ permeable; seeFIGS. 6 and 7. With bath solutions containing 10 mM Ca2+ (Na+ andK+-free) as the only charge carrier and at a holding potential of −60mV, we recorded inward currents larger than 50 pA in 15 out of 18neurons, indicating significant Ca2+ permeability of ASICs in themajority of cortical neurons (FIG. 6A). Consistent with activation ofhomomeric ASIC1a channels, currents carried by 10 mM Ca2+ were largelyblocked by both the nonspecific ASIC blocker amiloride and theASIC1a-specific blocker PcTX venom (FIG. 6B). The peak amplitude ofCa2+-mediated current was decreased to 26%±2% of control by 100 μMamiloride (n=6, p<0.01) and to 22%±0.9% by 100 ng/mL PcTX venom (n=5,p<0.01). Ca2+ imaging, in the presence of blockers of other major Ca2+entry pathways (MK801 10 μM and CNQX 20 μM for glutamate receptors;nimodipine 5 μM and co-conotoxin MVIIC 1 μM for voltage-gated Ca2+channels), demonstrated that 18 out of 20 neurons responded to a pH dropwith detectable increases in the concentration of intracellular Ca2+([Ca2+]i) (FIG. 7A). In general, [Ca2+]i remains elevated duringprolonged perfusion of low pH solutions. In some cells, the [Ca2+]iincrease lasted even longer than the duration of acid perfusion (FIG.7A). Long-lasting Ca2+ responses suggest that ASIC response in intactneurons may be less desensitized than in whole-cell recordings or thatCa2+ entry through ASICs may induce subsequent Ca2+ release fromintracellular stores. Preincubation of neurons with 1 μM thapsigarginpartially inhibited the sustained component of Ca2+ increase, suggestingthat Ca2+ release from intracellular stores may also contribute toacid-induced intracellular Ca2+ accumulation (n=6, data not shown).Similar to the current carried by Ca2+ ions (FIG. 6B), both peak andsustained increases in [Ca2+]i were largely inhibited by amiloride andPcTX venom (FIGS. 7A and 7B, n=6-8), consistent with involvement ofhomomeric ASIC1a in acid-induced [Ca2+]i increase. Knockout of the ASICIgene eliminated the acid-induced [Ca2+]i increase in all neurons withoutaffecting NMDA receptor-mediated Ca2+ response (FIG. 7C, n=8).Patch-clamp recordings demonstrated lack of acid-activated currents atpH 6.0 in 52 out of 52 of the ASIC1−/− neurons, consistent with absenceof ASICi a subunits. Lowering pH to 5.0 or 4.0, however, activateddetectable current in 24 out of 52 ASIC1−/− neurons, indicating thepresence of ASIC2a subunits in these neurons (FIG. 7D). Furtherelectrophysiological studies demonstrated that ASIC1^(−/−) neurons havenormal responses for various voltage-gated channels and NMDA, GABAreceptor-gated channels (data not shown).

4. ASIC Blockade Protects Acidosis-Induced, Glutamate-IndependentNeuronal Injury

FIG. 8 shows exemplary data suggesting that acid incubation may induceglutamate receptor-independent neuronal injury protected by ASICblockade. FIGS. 8A and 8B show graphs presenting exemplary data fortime-dependent LDH release induced by 1 hr (FIG. 8A) or 24 hr incubation(FIG. 8B) of cortical neurons in pH 7.4 (solid bars) or 6.0 ECF (openbars). N=20-25 wells, *p<0.05, and **p<0.01, compared to pH 7.4 group atthe same time points. (Acid-induced neuronal injury with fluoresceindiacetate (FDA) also was analyzed by staining of cell bodies of aliveneurons and propidium iodide (PI) staining of nuclei of dead neurons.)FIG. 8C shows a graph illustrating inhibition of acid-induced LDHrelease by 100 μM amiloride or 100 ng/mL PcTX venom (n=20-27, *p<0.05,and **p<0.01). MK801, CNQX, and nimodipine were present in ECF for allexperiments (FIGS. 8A-C).

Acid-induced injury was studied on neurons grown on 24-well platesincubated in either pH 7.4 or 6.0 ECF containing MK801, CNQX, andnimodipine; see FIG. 8. Cell injury was assayed by the measurement oflactate dehydrogenase (LDH) release (Koh and Choi, 1987) at various timepoints (FIGS. 8A and 8B) and by fluorescent staining of alive/deadcells. Compared to neurons treated at pH 7.4, 1 hr acid incubation (pH6.0) induced a time-dependent increase in LDH release (FIG. 8A). After24 hr, 45.7%±5.4% of maximal LDH release was induced (n=25 wells).Continuous treatment at pH 6.0 induced greater cell injury (FIG. 8B,n=20). Consistent with the LDH assay, alive/dead staining withfluorescein diacetate (FDA, blue) and propidium iodide (PI, red) showedsimilar increases in cell death by 1 hr acid treatment (see SupplementalFigure S3 (on the web site cited above), which is incorporated herein byreference). One hour incubation with pH 6.5 ECF also induced significantbut less LDH release than with pH 6.0 ECF (n=8 wells).

To determine whether activation of ASICs is involved in acid-inducedglutamate receptor-independent neuronal injury, we tested the effect ofamiloride and PcTX venom on acid-induced LDH release. Addition of either100 μM amiloride or 100 ng/mL PcTX venom 10 min before and during the 1hr acid incubation significantly reduced LDH release (FIG. 8C). At 24hr, LDH release was decreased from 45.3%±3.8% to 31.1%±2.5% by amilorideand to 27.9%±2.6% by PcTX venom (n=20-27, p<0.01). Addition of amilorideor PcTX venom in pH 7.4 ECF for 1 hr did not affect baseline LDHrelease, although prolonged incubation (e.g., 5 hr) with amiloride aloneincreased LDH release (n=8).

5. Activation of Homomeric ASIC1a May be Responsible forAcidosis-Induced Injury

FIG. 9 is a series of graphs presenting exemplary data indicating thatASIC1a may be involved in acid-induced injury in vitro. FIG. 9A showsexemplary data illustrating inhibition of acid-induced LDH release byreducing [Ca²⁺]_(e) (n=11-12, **p<0.01 compared with pH 6.0, 1.3 Ca2+).FIG. 9B shows exemplary data illustrating acid incubation inducedincrease of LDH release in ASIC1a-transfected but not nontransfectedCOS-7 cells (n=8-20). Amiloride (100 μM) inhibited acid-induced LDHrelease in ASIC1a-transfected cells. *p<0.05 for 7.4 versus 6.0 and 6.0versus 6.0+amiloride. FIG. 9C shows exemplary data illustrating a lackof acid-induced injury and protection by amiloride and PcTX venom inASIC1^(−/−) neurons (n=8 in each group, p>0.05). FIG. 9D shows exemplarydata illustrating acid-induced increase of LDH release in culturedcortical neurons under OGD (n=5). LDH release induced by combined 1 hrOGD/acidosis was not inhibited by trolox and L-NAME (n=8-11). OGD didnot potentiate acid-induced LDH release in ASIC1^(−/−) neurons. **p<0.01for pH 7.4 versus pH 6.0 and *p<0.05 for pH 6.0 versus 6.0+PcTX venom.MK801, CNQX, and nimodipine were present in ECF for all experiments(FIG. 9A-D).

To determine whether Ca2+ entry plays a role in acid-induced injury, wetreated neurons with pH 6.0 ECF in the presence of normal or reduced[Ca2+]e; see FIG. 9. Reducing Ca2+ from 1.3 to 0.2 mM inhibitedacid-induced LDH release (from 40.0%±4.1% to 21.9%±2.5%), as did ASIC1ablockade with PcTX venom (n=11-12, p<0.01; FIG. 9A). Ca2+-free solutionwas not tested, as a complete removal of [Ca2+]e may activate largeinward currents through a Ca2+-sensing cation channel, which mayotherwise complicate data interpretation (Xiong et al., 1997).Inhibition of acid injury by both amiloride and PcTX, nonspecific andspecific ASIC1a blockers, and by reducing [Ca2+]e suggests thatactivation of Ca2+-permeable ASIC1a may be involved in acid-inducedneuronal injury.

To provide additional evidence that activation of ASIC1a is involved inacid injury, we studied acid injury of nontransfected and ASIC1atransfected COS-7 cells, a cell line commonly used for expression ofASICs due to its lack of endogenous channels (Chen et al. 1998; Immkeand McCleskey 2001 and Escoubas et al. 2000). Following confluence(36-48 hr after plating), cells were treated with either pH 7.4 or 6.0ECF for 1 hr. LDH release was measured 24 hr after acid incubation.Treatment of nontransfected COS-7 cells with pH 6.0 ECF did not induceincreased LDH release when compared with pH 7.4-treated cells (10.3% a0.8% for pH 7.4, and 9.4%±0.7% for pH 6.0, N=19 and 20 wells; p>0.05,FIG. 9B). However, in COS-7 cells stably transfected with ASIC1a, 1 hrincubation at pH 6.0 significantly increased LDH release from 15.5%±2.4%to 24.0%±2.9% (n=8 wells, p<0.05). Addition of amiloride (100 μM)inhibited acid-induced LDH release in these cells (FIG. 9B).

We also studied acid injury of CHO cells transiently transfected withcDNAs encoding GFP alone or GFP plus ASIC1a. After the transfection(24-36 hr), cells were incubated with acidic solution (pH 6.0) for 1 hr,and cell injury was assayed 24 hr following the acid incubation. Asshown in Supplemental Figure S4 (at the website cited above), which isincorporated herein by reference, 1 hr acid incubation largely reducedsurviving GFP-positive cells in GFP/ASIC1a group but not in the grouptransfected with GFP alone (n=3 dishes in each group).

To further demonstrate an involvement of ASIC1a in acidosis-inducedneuronal injury, we performed cell toxicity experiments on corticalneurons cultured from ASIC^(+/+) and ASIC1^(−/−) mice (Wemmie et al.,2002). Again, 1 hr acid incubation of ASIC^(+/+) neurons at 6.0 inducedsubstantial LDH release that was reduced by amiloride and PcTX venom(n=8-12). One hour acid treatment of ASIC1^(−/−) neurons, however, didnot induce significant increase in LDH release at 24 hr (13.8%±0.9% forpH 7.4 and 14.2%±1.3% for pH 6.0, N=8, p>0.05), indicating resistance ofthese neurons to acid injury (FIG. 9C). In addition, knockout of theASIC1 gene also eliminated the effect of amiloride and PcTX venom onacid-induced LDH release (FIG. 9C, n=8 each), further suggesting thatthe inhibition of acid-induced injury of cortical neurons by amilorideand PcTX venom (FIG. 8C) was due to blockade of ASIC1 subunits. Incontrast to acid incubation, 1 hr treatment of ASIC1^(−/−) neurons with1 mM NMDA+10 μM glycine (in Mg²⁺-free [pH 7.4] ECF) induced 84.8%±1.4%of maximal LDH release at 24 hr (n=4, FIG. 9C), indicating normalresponse to other cell injury processes.

6. Modeled Ischemia Enhances Acidosis-Induced Glutamate-IndependentNeuronal Injury Via ASICs

As the magnitude of ASIC currents may be potentiated by cellular andneurochemical components of brain ischemia-cell swelling, arachidonicacid, and lactate (Allen and Attwell 2002 and Immke and McCleskey2001)—and, more importantly, the desensitization of ASIC currents may bereduced dramatically by modeled ischemia (see FIGS. 5A and 5C), weexpected that activation of ASICs in ischemic conditions should producegreater neuronal injury. To test this hypothesis, we subjected neuronsto 1 hr acid treatment under oxygen and glucose deprivation (OGD).MK801, CNQX, and nimodipine were added to all solutions to inhibitvoltage-gated Ca²⁺ channels and glutamate receptor-mediated cell injuryassociated with OGD (Kaku et al., 1991). One hour incubation with pH 7.4ECF under OGD conditions induced only 27.1%±3.5% of maximal LDH releaseat 24 hr (n=5, FIG. 9D). This finding is in agreement with a previousreport that 1 hr OGD does not induce substantial cell injury with theblockade of glutamate receptors and voltage-gated Ca²⁺ channels (Aartset al., 2003). However, 1 hr OGD, combined with acidosis (pH 6.0),induced 73.9%±4.3% of maximal LDH release (n=5, FIG. 9D, p<0.01),significantly larger than acid-induced LDH release in the absence of OGD(see FIG. 8A, p<0.05). Addition of the ASIC1a blocker PcTX venom (100ng/mL) significantly reduced acid/OGD-induced LDH release to 44.3%±5.3%(n=5, p<0.05, FIG. 9D).

We also performed the same experiment with cultured neurons from theASIC1^(−/−) mice. Unlike in ASICI containing neurons, however, 1 hrtreatment with combined OGD and acid only slightly increased LDH releasein ASIC1^(−/−) neurons (from 26.1%±2.7% to 30.4%±3.5%, N=10-12, FIG.9D). This finding suggests that potentiation of acid-induced injury byOGD may be due largely to OGD potentiation of ASIC1-mediated toxicity.

Aarts et al. (2003) have recently studied ischemia molded by prolongedOGD (2 hr) but without acidosis. In this model system, they demonstratedactivation of a Ca²⁺-permeable nonselective cation conductance activatedby reactive oxygen/nitrogen species resulting in glutamatereceptor-independent neuronal injury. The prolonged OGD-induced cellinjury modeled by Aarts et al. may be reduced dramatically by agentseither scavenging free radicals directly (e.g., trolox) or reducing theproduction of free radicals (e.g., L-NAME) (Aarts et al., 2003). Todetermine whether combined short duration OGD and acidosis inducedneuronal injury may involve a similar mechanism, we tested the effect oftrolox and L-NAME on OGD/acid-induced LDH release. As shown in FIG. 9D,neither trolox (500 μM) nor L-NAME (300 μM) had significant effect oncombined 1 hr OGD/acidosis-induced neuronal injury (n=8-11). Additionalexperiments demonstrated that the ASIC blockers amiloride and PcTX venomhad no effect on the conductance of TRPM7 channels reported to beresponsible for prolonged OGD-induced neuronal injury by Aarts et al.(2003) (Supplemental Figure S5 (see website listed above), which isincorporated herein by reference). Together, these findings stronglysuggest that activation of ASICs but not TRPM7 channels may be largelyresponsible for combined 1 hr OGD/acidosis-induced neuronal injury inour studies.

7. Activation of ASIC1a in Ischemic Brain Injury In Vivo

FIG. 10 shows data illustrating neuroprotection by ASICI blockade andASICI gene knockout in brain ischemia in vivo. FIG. 10A shows a graph ofexemplary data obtained from TTC-stained brain sections illustrating thestained volume (“infarct volume”) in brains from aCSF (n=7), amiloride(n=11), or PcTX venom (n=5) injected rats. *p<0.05 and **p<0.01 comparedwith aCSF injected group. FIG. 10B shows a graph of exemplary dataillustrating reduction in infarct volume in brains from ASIC1^(−/−) mice(n=6 for each group). *p<0.05 and **p<0.01 compared with +/+ group. FIG.10C shows a graph of exemplary data illustrating reduction in infarctvolume in brains from mice i.p. injected with 10 mg/kg memantine (Mem)or i.p. injection of memantine accompanied by i.c.v. injection of PcTXvenom (500 ng/mL). **p<0.01 compared with aCSF injection and betweenmemantine and memantine plus PcTX venom (n=5 in each group). FIG. 10Dshows a graph of exemplary data illustrating reduction in infarct volumein brains from either ASIC1^(+/+) (wt) or ASIC^(−/−) mice i.p. injectedwith memantine (n=5 in each group). *p<0.05, and **p<0.01.

To provide evidence that activation of ASIC1a may be involved inischemic brain injury in vivo, we first tested the protective effect ofamiloride and PcTX venom in a rat model of transient focal ischemia(Longa et al., 1989). Ischemia (100 min) was induced by transient middlecerebral artery occlusion (MCAO). A total of 6 μl artificial CSF (aCSF)alone, aCSF-containing amiloride (1 mM), or PcTX venom (500 ng/mL) wasinjected intracerebroventricularly 30 min before and after the ischemia.Based on the study by Westergaard (1969), the volume for cerebralventricular and spinal cord fluid for 4-week-old rats is estimated to be˜60 μl. Assuming that the infused amiloride and PcTX were uniformlydistributed in the CSF, we may expect a concentration of ˜100 μM foramiloride and −50 ng/mL for PcTX, which is a concentration foundeffective in our cell culture experiments. Infarct volume was determinedby TTC staining (Bederson et al., 1986) at 24 hr following ischemia.Ischemia (100 min) produced an infarct volume of 329.5±25.6 mm³ inaCSF-injected rats (n=7) but only 229.7±41.1 mm³ in amiloride-injected(n=11, p<0.05) and 130.4±55.0 mm³ (˜60% reduction) in PcTXvenom-injected rats (n=5, p<0.01) (FIG. 10A).

We next used ASIC1−/− mice to further demonstrate the involvement ofASIC1a in ischemic brain injury in vivo. Male ASIC1+/+, ASIC1+/−, andASIC1−/− mice (˜25 g, with congenic C57B16 background) were subjected to60 min MCAO as previously described (Stenzel-Poore et al., 2003).Consistent with the protection by pharmacological blockade of ASIC1a(above), −/− mice displayed significantly smaller (˜61% reduction)infarct volumes (32.9±4.7 mm3, N=6) as compared to +/+ mice (84.6±10.6mm3, N=6, p<0.01).+/− mice also showed reduced infarct volume(56.9.+−0.6.7 mm3, N=6, p<0.05) (FIG. 10B).

We then determined whether blockade of ASIC1a channels or knockout ofthe ASIC1 gene could provide additional protection in vivo in thesetting of glutamate receptor blockade. We selected the uncompetitiveNMDA receptor antagonist memantine, as it has been recently used insuccessful clinical trials (Tariot et al., 2004). Memantine (10 mg/kg)was injected intraperitoneally (i.p.) into C57B16 mice immediatelyfollowing 60 min MCAO and accompanied by intracerebroventricularinjection (i.c.v.) of a total volume of 0.4 μl aCSF alone or aCSFcontaining PcTX venom (500 ng/mL) 15 min before and following ischemia.In control mice with i.p. injection of saline and i.c.v. injection ofaCSF, 60 min MCAO induced an infarct volume of 123.6±5.3 mm³ (n=5, FIG.10C). In mice with i.p. injection of memantine and i.c.v. injection ofaCSF, the same duration of ischemia induced an infarct volume of73.8.+−0.6.9 mm³ (n=5, p<0.01). However, in mice injected with memantineand PcTX venom, an infarct volume of only 47.0±1.1 mm³ was induced (n=5,p<0.01 compared with both control and memantine groups, FIG. 10C). Thesedata suggest that blockade of homomeric ASIC1a may provide additionalprotection in in vivo ischemia in the setting of NMDA receptor blockade.Additional protection was also observed in ASIC1^(−/−) mice treated withpharmacologic NMDA blockade (FIG. 10D). In ASIC^(+/+) mice i.p. injectedwith saline or 10 mg/kg memantine, 60 min MCAO induced an infarct volumeof 101.4±9.4 mm³ or 61.6±12.7 mm³, respectively (n=5 in each group, FIG.10D). However, in ASIC1^(−/−) mice injected with memantine, the sameischemia duration induced an infarct volume of 27.7±1.6 mm³ (n=5),significantly smaller than the infarct volume in ASIC1^(+/+) miceinjected with memantine (p<0.05).

D. Discussion

Despite enormous recent progress defining cellular and molecularresponses of the brain to ischemia, there is no effective treatment forstroke patients. Most notable are the failures of multicenter clinicaltrials of glutamate antagonists (Lee et al. 1999 and Wahlgren and Ahmed2004). Here we demonstrate a new mechanism of ischemic brain injury andthe role of ischemic acidosis in this biology. We show that ischemicinjury in the setting of acidosis may occur via activation ofCa2+-permeable ASICs, a newly described class of ligand-gated channels(Waldmann et al., 1997a, and Waldmann and Lazdunski, 1998). This Ca2+toxicity may be independent of glutamate receptors or voltage-gated Ca2+channels.

Using whole-cell patch-clamp recording in mixed cortical cultures, wedemonstrate activation of ASIC currents in the range of pHe(extracellular pH) that occurs commonly in ischemia. With Fura-2fluorescent imaging and ion substitution protocols, we show ASICs mayflux Ca²⁺ in cortical neurons and may do so in the presence of NMDA,AMPA, and voltage-gated Ca²⁺ channel blockade. Using in vitro celltoxicity models, we demonstrate that acidosis may induceglutamate-independent neuronal injury, which may be reduced by bothnonspecific and specific ASIC1a antagonists, and by lowering [Ca²⁺]_(e).In addition, we show that neurons and COS-7 cells lacking ASIC1a may beresistant to acid injury, while transfection of COS-7 cells withCa²⁺-permeable ASIC1a may result in acid sensitivity. Using in vivofocal ischemia models, we demonstrate that pharmacologic blockade ofASIC1a channels and ASIC1a gene knockout may both protect the brain fromischemic injury and may do so in the presence of NMDA blockade.

Local [H+] may be the agonist for ASICs functioning during normalsynaptic transmission in the brain (Wemmie et al., 2002). This signalingmay not be injurious. However, ASICs also may respond to the global,marked pH declines that may be occurring in the ischemic brain. Within 1min of global ischemia, pHe falls from 7.2 to 6.5 (Simon et al., 1985),a level that may be sufficient to activate ASIC1a channels, which have apH0.5 at 6.2. Remarkably, ischemia itself, modeled in vitro, markedlymay enhance the magnitude of ASIC response at a given level of acidosis,thus potentiating toxic Ca2+ loading in ischemic neurons. Furthermore,ischemia dramatically may reduce desensitization of ASIC currents,signifying a possibility of long-lasting activity of ASICs duringprolonged ischemic acidosis in vivo.

It has been shown in intact animals that brief global reductions ofbrain pH to 6.5 alone do not produce brain injury (Litt et al., 1985),nor does hypoxia alone (Miyamoto and Auer, 2000, and Pearigen et al.,1996). However, our in vitro data suggest that the combination ofischemia (hypoxia) with acidosis (ischemic acidosis), as may occur invivo, may cause marked brain injury through ischemia enhancing the toxiceffect of ASIC1a channels. This argument is strongly supported by thefinding that both ASIC1a blockade and ASIC1a gene knockout producesubstantial (˜60%) reduction in infarct volume.

Acidosis, apart from affecting ischemic brain injury via ASICs, mayaffect the function of other channels as well. Particularly pertinent inischemia may be the acid blockade of the NMDA channels (Tang et al. 1990and Traynelis and Cull-Candy 1990), which may be protective against invitro ischemic neuronal injury (Kaku et al. 1993 and Giffard et al.1990). This NMDA blockade in the ischemic brain by acidosis might inpart explain the failure of NMDA antagonists in human stroke trials.Treatment of stroke with ASIC1a blockade may be particularly effective,as ischemic acidosis may be serving as an additional therapy by blockingNMDA function.

As our in vitro studies showing a protective effect of ASIC1a blockadewere performed in the presence of antagonists of NMDA, AMPA, andvoltage-gated Ca2+ channels, the findings reported here may offer a newand robust neuroprotective strategy for stroke, either alone or incombination with other therapies (MacGregor et al., 2003). Further, wedemonstrate in vivo that pharmacologic ASIC1a blockade or ASIC1a genedeletion may offer more potent neuroprotection against stroke than NMDAantagonism.

Together, our studies suggest that activation of Ca²+-permeable ASIC1amay be a novel, glutamate-independent biological mechanism underlyingischemic brain injury. As the regulation of other potentially protectiveASIC subunits also occurs in the ischemic brain (Johnson et al., 2001),these findings may help the design of novel therapeutic neuroprotectivestrategies for brain ischemia.

E. Experimental Procedures

1. Neuronal Culture

Following anesthesia with halothane, cerebral cortices were dissectedfrom E16 Swiss mice or P1 ASIC1^(+/+) and ASIC1^(−/−) mice and incubatedwith 0.05% trypsin-EDTA for 10 min at 37° C. Tissues were thentriturated with fire-polished glass pipettes and plated onpoly-L-ornithine-coated 24-well plates or 25×25 mm glass coverslips at adensity of 2.5×10⁵ cells per well or 10⁶⁺ cells per coverslip. Neuronswere cultured with MEM supplemented with 10% horse serum (for E16cultures) or Neurobasal medium supplemented with B27 (for P1 cultures)and used for electrophysiology and toxicity studies after 12 days. Glialgrowth was suppressed by addition of 5-fluoro-2-deoxyuridine anduridine, yielding cultured cells with 90% neurons as determined by NeuNand GFAP staining (data not shown).

2. Electrophysiology

ASIC currents were recorded with whole-cell patch-clamp andfast-perfusion techniques. The normal extracellular solution (ECF)contained (in mM) 140 NaCl, 5.4 KCl, 25 HEPES, 20 glucose, 1.3 CaCl₂,1.0 MgCl₂, 0.0005 TTX (pH 7.4), 320-335 mOsm. For low pH solutions,various amounts of HCl were added. For solutions with pH<6.0, MESinstead of HEPES was used for more reliable pH buffering. Patchelectrodes contained (in mM) 140 CsF, 2.0 MgCl₂, 1.0 CaC₂, 10 HEPES, 11EGTA, 4 MgATP (pH 7.3), 300 mOsm. The Na+-free solution consisted of 10mM CaCl₂, 25 mM HEPES with equiosmotic NMDG or sucrose substituting forNaCl (Chu et al., 2002). A multibarrel perfusion system (SF-77B, WarnerInstrument Co.) was employed for rapid exchange of solutions.

3. Cell Injury Assay—LDH Measurement

Cells were washed three times with ECF and randomly divided intotreatment groups. MK801 (10 μM), CNQX (20 μM), and nimodipine (5 μM)were added in all groups to eliminate potential secondary activation ofglutamate receptors and voltage-gated Ca²⁺ channels. Following acidincubation, neurons were washed and incubated in Neurobasal medium at37° C. LDH release was measured in culture medium using the LDH assaykit (Roche Molecular Biochemicals). Medium (100 μL) was transferred fromculture wells to 96-well plates and mixed with 100 μL reaction solutionprovided by the kit. Optical density was measured at 492 nm 30 minlater, utilizing a microplate reader (Spectra Max Plus, MolecularDevices). Background absorbance at 620 was subtracted. The maximalreleasable LDH was obtained in each well by 15 min incubation with 1%Triton X-100 at the end of each experiment.

4. Ca²⁺ Imaging

Cortical neurons grown on 25×25 mm glass coverslips were washed threetimes with ECF and incubated with 5 μM fura-2-acetoxymethyl ester for 40min at 22° C., washed three times, and incubated in normal ECF for 30min. Coverslips were transferred to a perfusion chamber on an invertedmicroscope (Nikon TE300). Cells were illuminated using a xenon lamp andobserved with a 40× UV fluor oil-immersion objective lens, and videoimages were obtained using a cooled CCD camera (Sensys KAF 1401,Photometrics). Digitized images were acquired and analyzed in a PCcontrolled by Axon Imaging Workbench software (Axon Instruments). Theshutter and filter wheel (Lambda 10-2) were controlled by the softwareto allow timed illumination of cells at 340 or 380 nm excitationwavelengths. Fura-2 fluorescence was detected at emission wavelength of510 nm. Ratio images (340/380) were analyzed by averaging pixel ratiovalues in circumscribed regions of cells in the field of view. Thevalues were exported to SigmaPlot for further analysis.

5. Fluorescein-Diacetate Staining and Propidium Iodide Uptake

Cells were incubated in ECF containing fluorescein-diacetate (FDA) (5μM) and propidium iodide (PI) (2 μM) for 30 min followed by wash withdye-free ECF. Alive (FDA-positive) and dead (PI-positive) cells wereviewed and counted on a microscope (Zeiss) equipped with epifluorescenceat 580/630 nm excitation/emission for PI and 500/550 nm for FDA. Imageswere collected using an Optronics DEI-730 camera equipped with a BQ 8000sVGA frame grabber and analyzed using computer software (Bioquant, TN).

6. Transfection of COS-7 Cells

COS-7 cells were cultured in MEM with 10% HS and 1% PenStrep (GIBCO). At˜50% confluence, cells were cotransfected with cDNAs for ASICs and GFPin pc^(DNA3) vector using FuGENE6 transfection reagents (Roche MolecularBiochemicals). DNA for ASICs (0.75 μg) and 0.25 μg of DNA for GFP wereused for each 35 mm dish. GFP-positive cells were selected forpatch-clamp recording 48 hr after transfection. For stable transfectionof ASIC1a, 500 μg/mL G418 was added to culture medium 1 week followingthe transfection. The surviving G418-resistant cells were further platedand passed for >5 passages in the presence of G418. Cells were thenchecked with patch-clamp and immunofluorescent staining for theexpression of ASIC1a.

7. Oxygen-Glucose Deprivation

Neurons were washed three times and incubated with glucose-free ECF atpH 7.4 or 6.0 in an anaerobic chamber (Model 1025, Forma Scientific)with an atmosphere of 85% N₂, 10% H₂, and 5% CO₂ at 35° C.Oxygen-glucose deprivation (OGD) was terminated after 1 hr by replacingthe glucose-free ECF with Neurobasal medium and incubating the culturesin a normal cell culture incubator. With HEPES-buffered ECF used, 1 hrOGD slightly reduced pH from 7.38 to 7.28 (n=3) and from 6.0 to 5.96(n=4).

8. Focal Ischemia

Transient focal ischemia was induced by suture occlusion of the middlecerebral artery (MCAO) in male rats (SD, 250-300 g) and mice (withcongenic C57B16 background, ˜25 g) anesthetized using 1.5% isoflurane,70% N_(2O), and 28.5% O₂ with intubation and ventilation. Rectal andtemporalis muscle temperature was maintained at 37° C.±0.5° C. with athermostatically controlled heating pad and lamp. Cerebral blood flowwas monitored by transcranical LASER doppler. Animals with blood flownot reduced below 20% were excluded.

Animals were killed with chloral hydrate 24 hr after ischemia. Brainswere rapidly removed, sectioned coronally at 1 mm (mice) or 2 mm (rats)intervals, and stained by immersion in vital dye (2%)2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium hydrochloride (TTC). Infarction area wascalculated by subtracting the normal area stained with TTC in theischemic hemisphere from the area of the nonischemic hemisphere. Infarctvolume was calculated by summing infarction areas of all sections andmultiplying by slice thickness. Rat intraventricular injection wasperformed by stereotaxic technique using a microsyringe pump withcannula inserted stereotactically at 0.8 mm posterior to bregma, 1.5 mmlateral to midline, and 3.8 mm ventral to the dura. All manipulationsand analyses were performed by individuals blinded to treatment groups.

REFERENCES

-   Aarts, M., Iihara, K., Wei, W. L., Xiong, Z. G., Arundine, M.,    Cerwinski, W., MacDonald, J. F. and Tymianski, M., 2003. A key role    for TRPM7 channels in anoxic neuronal death. Cell 115, pp. 863-877.-   Akopian, A. N., Chen, C. C., Ding, Y., Cesare, P. and Wood, J.    N., 2000. A new member of the acid-sensing ion channel family.    Neuroreport 11, pp. 2217-2222.-   Allen, N. J. and Attwell, D., 2002. Modulation of ASIC channels in    rat cerebellar Purkinje neurons by ischemia-related signals. J.    Physiol. 543, pp. 521-529.-   Alvarez de la Rosa, D., Zhang, P., Shao, D., White, F. and    Canessa, C. M., 2002. Functional implications of the localization    and activity of acid-sensitive channels in rat peripheral nervous    system. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99, pp. 2326-2331.-   Alvarez de la Rosa, D., Krueger, S. R., Kolar, A., Shao, D.,    Fitzsimonds, R. M. and Canessa, C. M., 2003. Distribution,    subcellular localization and ontogeny of ASIC1 in the mammalian    central nervous system. J. Physiol. 546, pp. 77-87.-   Bassilana, F., Champigny, G., Waldmann, R., De Weille, J. R.,    Heurteaux, C. and Lazdunski, M., 1997. The acid-sensitive ionic    channel subunit ASIC and the mammalian degenerin MDEG form a    heteromultimeric H+-gated Na+ channel with novel properties. J.    Biol. Chem. 272, pp. 28819-28822.-   Bederson, J. B., Pitts, L. H., Germano, S. M., Nishimura, M. C.,    Davis, R. L. and Bartkowski, H. M., 1986. Evaluation of    2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride as a stain for detection and    quantification of experimental cerebral infarction in rats. Stroke    17, pp. 1304-1308.-   Benos, D. J. and Stanton, B. A., 1999. Functional domains within the    degenerin/epithelial sodium channel (Deg/ENaC) superfamily of ion    channels. J. Physiol. 520, pp. 631-644.-   Benson, C. J., Eckert, S. P. and McCleskey, E. W., 1999. Acid-evoked    currents in cardiac sensory neurons: a possible mediator of    myocardial ischemic sensation. Circ. Res. 84, pp. 921-928.-   Bevan, S. and Yeats, J., 1991. Protons activate a cation conductance    in a sub-population of rat dorsal root ganglion neurones. J.    Physiol. 433, pp. 145-161.-   Bianchi, L. and Driscoll, M., 2002. Protons at the gate: DEG/ENaC    ion channels help us feel and remember. Neuron 34, pp. 337-340.-   Chen, C. C., England, S., Akopian, A. N. and Wood, J. N., 1998. A    sensory neuron-specific, proton-gated ion channel. Proc. Natl. Acad    Sci. USA 95, pp. 10240-10245.-   Chen, C. C., Zimmer, A., Sun, W. H., Hall, J., Brownstein, M. J. and    Zimmer, A., 2002. A role for ASIC3 in the modulation of    high-intensity pain stimuli. Proc. Natl. Acad Sci. USA 99, pp.    8992-8997.-   Choi, D. W., 1988. Calcium-mediated neurotoxicity: relationship to    specific channel types and role in ischemic damage. Trends Neurosci.    11, pp. 465-469 a.-   Choi, D. W., 1988. Glutamate neurotoxicity and diseases of the    nervous system. Neuron 1, pp. 623-634 b.-   Choi, D. W., 1995. Calcium: still center-stage in hypoxic-ischemic    neuronal death. Trends Neurosci. 18, pp. 58-60.-   Chu, X. P., Miesch, J., Johnson, M., Root, L., Zhu, X. M., Chen, D.,    Simon, R. P. and Xiong, Z. G., 2002. Proton-gated channels in PC12    cells. J. Neurophysiol. 87, pp. 2555-2561.-   Dingledine, R., Borges, K., Bowie, D. and Traynelis, S. F., 1999.    The glutamate receptor ion channels. Pharmacol. Rev. 51, pp. 7-61.-   Escoubas, P., De Weille, J. R., Lecoq, A., Diochot, S., Waldmann,    R., Champigny, G., Moinier, D., Menez, A. and Lazdunski, M., 2000.    Isolation of a tarantula toxin specific for a class of proton-gated    Na+ channels. J. Biol. Chem. 275, pp. 25116-25121.-   Giffard, R. G., Monyer, H., Christine, C. W. and Choi, D. W., 1990.    Acidosis reduces NMDA receptor activation, glutamate neurotoxicity,    and oxygen-glucose deprivation neuronal injury in cortical cultures.    Brain Res. 506, pp. 339-342.-   Goldberg, M. P. and Choi, D. W., 1993. Combined oxygen and glucose    deprivation in cortical cell culture: calcium-dependent and    calcium-independent mechanisms of neuronal injury. J. Neurosci. 13,    pp. 3510-3524.-   Grunder, S., Geissler, H. S., Bassler, E. L. and Ruppersberg, J.    P., 2000. A new member of acid-sensing ion channels from pituitary    gland. Neuroreport 11, pp. 1607-1611.-   Immke, D. C. and McCleskey, E. W., 2001. Lactate enhances the    acid-sensing Na+ channel on ischemia-sensing neurons. Nat. Neurosci.    4, pp. 869-870.-   Jia, Z., Agopyan, N., Miu, P., Xiong, Z., Henderson, J., Gerlai, R.,    Tavema, F. A., Velumian, A., MacDonald, J., Carlen, P. et al., 1996.    Enhanced LTP in mice deficient in the AMPA receptor GluR2. Neuron    17, pp. 945-956.-   Johnson, M. B., Jin, K., Minami, M., Chen, D. and Simon, R.    P., 2001. Global ischemia induces expression of acid-sensing ion    channel 2a in rat brain. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 21, pp.    734-740.-   Kaku, D. A., Goldberg, M. P. and Choi, D. W., 1991. Antagonism of    non-NMDA receptors augments the neuroprotective effect of NMDA    receptor blockade in cortical cultures subjected to prolonged    deprivation of oxygen and glucose. Brain Res. 554, pp. 344-347.-   Kaku, D. A., Giffard, R. G. and Choi, D. W., 1993. Neuroprotective    effects of glutamate antagonists and extracellular acidity. Science    260, pp. 1516-1518.-   Koh, J. Y. and Choi, D. W., 1987. Quantitative determination of    glutamate mediated cortical neuronal injury in cell culture by    lactate dehydrogenase efflux assay. J. Neurosci. Methods 20, pp.    83-90.-   Krishtal, O., 2003. The ASICs: signaling molecules?. Modulators?    Trends Neurosci. 26, pp. 477-483.-   Krishtal, O. A. and Pidoplichko, V. I., 1981. A receptor for protons    in the membrane of sensory neurons may participate in nociception.    Neuroscience 6, pp. 2599-2601.-   Lee, J. M., Zipfel, G. J. and Choi, D. W., 1999. The changing    landscape of ischaemic brain injury mechanisms. Nature Suppl. 399,    pp. A7-14.-   Lingueglia, E., De Weille, J. R., Bassilana, F., Heurteaux, C.,    Sakai, H., Waldmann, R. and Lazdunski, M., 1997. A modulatory    subunit of acid sensing ion channels in brain and dorsal root    ganglion cells. J. Biol. Chem. 272, pp. 29778-29783.-   Litt, L., Gonzalez-Mendez, R., Severinghaus, J. W., Hamilton, W. K.,    Shuleshko, J., Murphy-Boesch, J. and James, T. L., 1985. Cerebral    intracellular changes during supercarbia: an in vivo 31P nuclear    magnetic resonance study in rats. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 5, pp.    537-544.-   Longa, E. Z., Weinstein, P. R., Carlson, S. and Cummins, R., 1989.    Reversible middle cerebral artery occlusion without craniectomy in    rats. Stroke 20, pp. 84-91.-   MacGregor, D. G., Avshalumov, M. V. and Rice, M. E., 2003. Brain    edema induced by in vitro ischemia: causal factors and    neuroprotection. J. Neurochem. 85, pp. 1402-1411.-   McDonald, J. W., Bhattacharyya, T., Sensi, S. L., Lobner, D.,    Ying, H. S., Canzoniero, L. M. and Choi, D. W., 1998. Extracellular    acidity potentiates AMPA receptor-mediated cortical neuronal    death. J. Neurosci. 18, pp. 6290-6299.-   McLennan, H., 1983. Receptors for the excitatory amino acids in the    mammalian central nervous system. Prog. Neurobiol. 20, pp. 251-271.-   Meldrum, B. S., 1995. Excitatory amino acid receptors and their role    in epilepsy and cerebral ischemia. Ann. N Y Acad Sci. 757, pp.    492-505.-   Miyamoto, 0. and Auer, R. N., 2000. Hypoxia, hyperoxia, ischemia,    and brain necrosis. Neurology 54, pp. 362-371.-   Nedergaard, M., Kraig, R. P., Tanabe, J. and Pulsinelli, W.    A., 1991. Dynamics of interstitial and intracellular pH in evolving    brain infarct. Am. J. Physiol. 260, pp. R581-R588.-   Pearigen, P., Gwinn, R. and Simon, R. P., 1996. The effects in vivo    of hypoxia on brain injury. Brain Res. 725, pp. 184-191.-   Price, M. P., Snyder, P. M. and Welsh, M. J., 1996. Cloning and    expression of a novel human brain Na+ channel. J. Biol. Chem. 271,    pp. 7879-7882.-   Price, M. P., Lewin, G. R., Mcllwrath, S. L., Cheng, C., Xie, J.,    Heppenstall, P. A., Stucky, C. L., Mannsfeldt, A. G., Brennan, T.    J., Drummond, H. A. et al., 2000. The mammalian sodium channel BNC1    is required for normal touch sensation. Nature 407, pp. 1007-1011.-   Price, M. P., Mcllwrath, S. L., Xie, J., Cheng, C., Qiao, J.,    Tarr, D. E., Sluka, K. A., Brennan, T. J., Lewin, G. R. and    Welsh, M. J., 2001. The DRASIC cation channel contributes to the    detection of cutaneous touch and acid stimuli in mice. Neuron 32,    pp. 1071-1083.-   Rehncrona, S., 1985. Brain acidosis. Ann. Emerg. Med 14, pp.    770-776.-   Rothman, S. M. and Olney, J. W., 1986. Glutamate and the    pathophysiology of hypoxic-ischemic brain damage. Ann. Neurol. 19,    pp. 105-111.-   Sattler, R., Xiong, Z., Lu, W. Y., Hafner, M., MacDonald, J. F. and    Tymianski, M., 1999. Specific coupling of NMDA receptor activation    to nitric oxide neurotoxicity by PSD-95 protein. Science 284, pp.    1845-1848.-   Siesjo, B. K., Katsura, K. and Kristian, T., 1996. Acidosis-related    damage. Adv. Neurol. 71, pp. 209-233.-   Simon, R. P., Swan, J. H., Griffiths, T. and Meldrum, B. S., 1984.    Blockade of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors may protect against    ischemic damage in the brain. Science 226, pp. 850-852.-   Simon, R. P., Benowitz, N., Hedlund, R. and Copeland, J., 1985.    Influence of the blood-brain pH gradient on brain phenobarbital    uptake during status epilepticus. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 234, pp.    830-835.-   Sluka, K. A., Price, M. P., Breese, N. M., Stucky, C. L.,    Wemmie, J. A. and Welsh, M. J., 2003. Chronic hyperalgesia induced    by repeated acid injections in muscle is abolished by the loss of    ASIC3, but not ASIC1. Pain 106, pp. 229-239.-   Stenzel-Poore, M. P., Stevens, S. L., Xiong, Z., Lessov, N. S.,    Harrington, C. A., Mori, M., Meller, R., Rosenzweig, H. L., Tobar,    E., Shaw, T. E. et al., 2003. Effect of ischaemic preconditioning on    genomic response to cerebral ischaemia: similarity to    neuroprotective strategies in hibernation and hypoxia-tolerant    states. Lancet 362, pp. 1028-1037.-   Swanson, R. A., Farrell, K. and Simon, R. P., 1995. Acidosis causes    failure of astrocyte glutamate uptake during hypoxia. J. Cereb.    Blood Flow Metab. 15, pp. 417-424.-   Tang, C. M., Dichter, M. and Morad, M., 1990. Modulation of the    N-methyl-D-aspartate channel by extracellular H+. Proc. Natl. Acad.    Sci. USA 87, pp. 6445-6449.-   Tariot, P. N., Farlow, M. R., Grossberg, G. T., Graham, S. M.,    McDonald, S. and Gergel, I., 2004. Memantine treatment in patients    with moderate to severe Alzheimer disease already receiving    donepezil: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 291, pp. 317-324.-   Tombaugh, G. C. and Sapolsky, R. M., 1993. Evolving concepts about    the role of acidosis in ischemic neuropathology. J. Neurochem. 61,    pp. 793-803.-   Traynelis, S. F. and Cull-Candy, S. G., 1990. Proton inhibition of    N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors in cerebellar neurons. Nature 345,    pp. 347-350.-   Ugawa, S., Ueda, T., Ishida, Y., Nishigaki, M., Shibata, Y. and    Shimada, S., 2002. Amiloride-blockable acid-sensing ion channels are    leading acid sensors expressed in human nociceptors. J. Clin.    Invest. 110, pp. 1185-1190.-   Vanning, T., 1999. Proton-gated ion channels in cultured mouse    cortical neurons. Neuropharmacology 38, pp. 1875-1881.-   Wahlgren, N. G. and Ahmed, N., 2004. Neuroprotection in cerebral    ischaemia: facts and fancies—the need for new approaches.    Cerebrovasc. Dis. Supp. 17, pp. 153-166.-   Waldmann, R. and Lazdunski, M., 1998. H(+)-gated cation channels:    neuronal acid sensors in the NaC/DEG family of ion channels. Curr.    Opin. Neurobiol. 8, pp. 418-424.-   Waldmann, R., Champigny, G., Bassilana, F., Heurteaux, C. and    Lazdunski, M., 1997a. A proton-gated cation channel involved in    acid-sensing. Nature 386, pp. 173-177.-   Waldmann, R., Bassilana, F., de Weille, J., Champigny, G.,    Heurteaux, C. and Lazdunski, M., 1997b. Molecular cloning of a    non-inactivating proton-gated Na+ channel specific for sensory    neurons. J. Biol. Chem. 272, pp. 20975-20978.-   Waldmann, R., Champigny, G., Lingueglia, E., De Weille, J.,    Heurteaux, C. and Lazdunski, M., 1999. H(+)-gated cation channels.    Ann. N Y Acad. Sci. 868, pp. 67-76.-   Wemmie, J. A., Chen, J., Askwith, C. C., Hruska-Hageman, A. M.,    Price, M. P., Nolan, B. C., Yoder, P. G., Lamani, E., Hoshi, T.,    Freeman, J. H. and Welsh, M. J., 2002. The acid-activated ion    channel ASIC contributes to synaptic plasticity, learning, and    memory. Neuron 34, pp. 463-477.-   Wemmie, J. A., Askwith, C. C., Lamani, E., Cassell, M. D., Freeman    Jr., J. H. and Welsh, M. J., 2003. Acid-sensing ion channel 1 is    localized in brain regions with high synaptic density and    contributes to fear conditioning. J. Neurosci. 23, pp. 5496-5502.-   Westergaard, E., 1969. The cerebral ventricles of the rat during    growth. Acta Anat. (Basel) 74, pp. 405-423.-   Xiong, Z., Lu, W. and MacDonald, J. F., 1997. Extracellular calcium    sensed by a novel cation channel in hippocampal neurons. Proc. Natl.    Acad. Sci. USA 94, pp. 7012-7017.-   Yermolaieva, O., Leonard, A. S., Schnizler, M. K., Abboud, F. M. and    Welsh, M. J., 2004. Extracellular acidosis increases neuronal cell    calcium by activating acid-sensing ion channel 1a. Proc. Natl. Acad.    Sci. USA 101, pp. 6752-6757.-   Ying, W., Han, S. K., Miller, J. W. and Swanson, R. A., 1999.    Acidosis potentiates oxidative neuronal death by multiple    mechanisms. J. Neurochem. 73, pp. 1549-1556.

Example 2: Time Window of PcTX Neuroprotection

This example describes exemplary experiments that measure theneuroprotective effect of PcTX venom at different times after onset ofstroke in rodents; see FIG. 11. Brain ischemia (stroke) was induced inrodents by mid-cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO). At the indicated timesafter induction, artificial cerebrospinal fluid (aCSF), PcTX venom (0.5μL, 500 ng/mL total protein), or inactivated (boiled) venom was infusedinto the lateral ventricles of each rodent. Administration of PcTX venomprovided a 60% reduction in stroke volume both at one hour and at threehours after stroke onset. Furthermore, substantial stroke volumereduction still may be maintained if treatment is withheld for fivehours after the onset of the MCAO. Accordingly, neuroprotection due toASIC inhibition may have an extended therapeutic time window afterstroke onset, allowing stroke subjects to benefit from treatmentperformed hours after the stroke began. This effect of ASIC blockade onstroke neuroprotection is far more robust than that of calcium channelblockade of the NMDA receptor (a major target for experimental stroketherapeutics) using a glutamate antagonist. No glutamate antagonist,thus far, has such a favorable profile as shown here forASIC1a-selective inhibition.

Example 3: Exemplary Cystine Knot Peptides

This example describes exemplary cystine knot peptides, includingfull-length PcTx1 and deletion derivatives of PcTx, which may bescreened in cultured cells, tested in ischemic animals (e.g., rodentssuch as mice or rats), and/or administered to ischemic human subjects;see FIGS. 12 and 13.

FIG. 12 shows the primary amino acid sequence (SEQ ID NO:1), inone-letter code, of an exemplary cystine knot peptide, PcTx1, indicatedat 50, with various exemplary peptide features shown relative to aminoacid positions 1-40. Peptide 50 may include six cysteine residues thatform cystine bonds 52, 54, 56 to create a cystine knot motif 58. Thepeptide also may include one or more beta sheet regions 60 and apositively charged region 62. An N-terminal region 64 and a C-terminalregion 66 may flank the cystine knot motif.

FIG. 13 shows a comparison of the PcTx1 peptide 50 of FIG. 12 alignedwith various exemplary deletion derivatives of the peptide. Thesederivatives may include an N-terminal deletion 70 (SEQ ID NO:2), apartial C-terminal deletion 72 (SEQ ID NO:3), a full C-terminal deletion74 (SEQ ID NO:4), and an N/C terminal deletion 76 (SEQ ID NO:5). Otherderivatives of PcTx1 may include any deletion, insertion, orsubstitution of one or more amino acids, for example, while maintainingsequence similarity or identity of at least about 25% or about 50% withthe original PcTx1 sequence.

Each PcTx1 derivative may be tested for its ability to inhibit ASICproteins selectively and/or for an effect, if any, on ischemia. Anysuitable test system(s) may be used to perform this testing includingany of the cell-based assay systems and/or animal model systemsdescribed elsewhere in the present teachings. The PcTx1 derivative alsoor alternatively may be tested in ischemic human subjects.

Example 4: Selectivity of PcTX Venom for ASIC1a

This example describes experiments that measure the selectivity of PcTXvenom (and thus PcTx1 toxin) for ASIC1a alone, relative to other ASICproteins or combinations of ASIC proteins expressed in cultured cells;see FIG. 14. COS-7 cells expressing the indicated ASIC proteins weretreated with PcTX venom (25 ng/mL on ASIC1a expressing cells and 500ng/mL on ASIC2a, ASIC3 or ASIC1a+2a expressing cells). Channel currentswere measured at the pH of half maximal channel activation (pH 0.5).PcTX venom largely blocked the currents mediated by ASIC1a homomericchannels at a protein concentration of 25 ng/mL, with no effect on thecurrents mediated by homomeric ASIC2a, ASIC3, or heteromericASIC1a/ASIC2a at 500 ng/mL (n=3-6, FIG. 14). At 500 ng/mL, PcTX venomalso did not affect the currents mediated by other ligand-gated channels(e.g. NMDA and GABA receptor-gated channels) and voltage-gated channels(e.g. Na+, Ca2+, and K+ channels) (n=4-5). These experiments indicatethat PcTX venom and thus PcTx1 peptide is a specific blocker forhomomeric ASIC1a. Using this cell-based assay system, the potency andselectivity of ASIC inhibition may be measured for various syntheticpeptides or other candidate inhibitors (e.g., see Example 3).

Example 5: Nasal Administration of PcTX Venom is Neuroprotective

This example describes exemplary data indicating the efficacy of nasallyadministered PcTX venom for reducing ischemia-induced injury in ananimal model system of stroke; see FIG. 15. Cerebral ischemia wasinduced in male mice by mid-cerebral artery occlusion. One hour afterocclusion was initiated animals were treated as controls or were treatedwith PcTX venom (50 μL of 5 ng/mL (total protein) PcTx venom introducedintranasally). Nasal administration of PcTX venom resulted in a 55%reduction in ischemia-induced injury (ischemic damage), as defined byinfarct volume, relative to control treatment. Nasal administration maybe via a spray that is deposited substantially in the nasal passagesrather than inhaled into the lungs and/or may be via an aerosol that isat least partially inhaled into the lungs. In some examples, nasaladministration may have a number of advantages over other routes ofadministration, such as more efficient delivery to the brain and/oradaptability for self-administration by an ischemic subject.

Example 6 Selected Embodiments

This example describes selected embodiments of the present teachings,presented as a series of indexed paragraphs.

1. A method for the treatment of ischemia-induced injury, comprising:

administering a therapeutically effective amount of an inhibitor of anacid sensing ion channel (ASIC) family member to a subject in needthereof.

2. The method of paragraph 1, wherein the step of administering isperformed on a stroke patient.

3. The method of paragraph 1, wherein the step of administering isperformed based on a risk of the subject for a future ischemic episodeor based or due to chronic ischemia.

4. The method of paragraph 1, wherein the step of administering isperformed to treat injury induced by ischemic heart disease.

5. The method of paragraph 1, wherein the step of administering includesadministering a plurality of doses of the inhibitor to the subject atdifferent times.

6. The method of paragraph 1, wherein the step of administering isperformed by injection of the inhibitor.

7. The method of paragraph 1, wherein the step of administering isperformed by ingesting or breathing the inhibitor.

8. The method of paragraph 1, wherein the step of administering includesadministering an inhibitor of ASIC1 family members.

9. The method of paragraph 8, wherein the step of administering includesadministering an inhibitor that is selective for ASIC1 family membersrelative to other ASIC family members.

10. The method of paragraph 1, wherein the step of administeringincludes administering an inhibitor of ASIC1a.

11. The method of paragraph 10, wherein the step of administeringincludes administering an inhibitor that is selective for ASIC1arelative to other ASIC family members.

12. The method of paragraph 11, wherein the step of administeringincludes administering an inhibitor that is specific for ASIC1a relativeto other ASIC family members.

13. The method of paragraph 1, wherein the step of administeringincludes administering a peptide having a cystine knot motif.

14. The method of paragraph 13, wherein the step of administeringincludes administering PcTx1, a toxin peptide from a tarantula species.

15. A method of screening for drugs to treat ischemia-induced injury,comprising: selecting an assay system for measuring interaction withASIC1a;

testing a set of compounds for interaction with ASIC1a in the assaysystem to identify at least one compound that shows interaction;

administering the at least one compound, or a structural relativethereof, to a subject with ischemia to test the efficacy of the at leastone compound or the structural relative for treatment ofischemia-induced injury.

16. The method of paragraph 15, wherein the step of selecting an assaysystem includes selecting an assay system that measures ion fluxmediated by ASIC1a.

17. The method of paragraph 16, wherein the step of selecting an assaysystem includes selecting an assay system that measures flux of calciummediated by ASIC1a.

18. The method of paragraph 16, wherein the step of testing a set ofcompounds includes testing the compounds for inhibition of the ion flux.

19. The method of paragraph 15, wherein the step of testing a set ofcompounds includes a step of testing the set of compounds for selectiveor specific inhibition of ASIC1a relative to at least one other ASICfamily member.

20. A composition for treating ischemia-induced injury, comprising:

an ASIC1a inhibitor configured as a medicament for administration tohuman subjects.

21. The composition of paragraph 20, wherein the ASIC1a inhibitor isselective or specific for ASIC1a relative to each other ASIC familymember.

22. The composition of paragraph 20, wherein the ASIC1a inhibitor is apeptide having a cystine knot motif.

23. The composition of paragraph 22, wherein the peptide is PcTx1, atoxin from a tarantula species.

The disclosure set forth above may encompass one or more distinctinventions, with independent utility. Each of these inventions has beendisclosed in its preferred form(s). These preferred forms, including thespecific embodiments thereof as disclosed and illustrated herein, arenot intended to be considered in a limiting sense, because numerousvariations are possible. The subject matter of the inventions includesall novel and nonobvious combinations and subcombinations of the variouselements, features, functions, and/or properties disclosed herein. Thefollowing claims particularly point out certain combinations andsubcombinations regarded as novel and nonobvious. Inventions embodied inother combinations and subcombinations of features, functions, elements,and/or properties may be claimed in applications claiming priority fromthis or a related application. Such claims, whether directed to adifferent invention or to the same invention, and whether broader,narrower, equal, or different in scope to the original claims, also areregarded as included within the subject matter of the inventions of thepresent disclosure.

1. A method of treating ischemia, comprising: administering atherapeutically effective amount of an acid sensing ion channel 1a(ASIC1a) inhibitor to an ischemic subject in order to reduce injuryresulting from ischemia, wherein the ion channel 1a (ASIC1a) inhibitoris a peptide that includes a cystine knot.
 2. The method of claim 1,wherein the step of administering includes a step of administering anASIC1a inhibitor that inhibits ASIC1a selectively relative to one ormore other acid sensing ion channel (ASIC) family members.
 3. The methodof claim 1, wherein the step of administering includes a step ofadministering an inhibitor that is selective for ASICI a relative toevery other member of the ASIC family.
 4. The method of claim 1, whereinthe step of administering is performed on a subject that has suffered astroke, in order to reduce injury resulting from the stroke.
 5. Themethod of claim 1, wherein the step of administering includes a step ofadministering the inhibitor nasally, intrathecally, and/or epidurally.6. (canceled)
 7. The method of claim 1, wherein the step ofadministering includes a step of administering a peptide that is aderivative of PcTx1 (SEQ ID NO:1).
 8. The method of claim 7, wherein thepeptide is a derivative that differs from PcTx1 by at least onedeletion, substitution, and/or addition of one or more amino acids. 9.The method of claim 1, the ASIC1a inhibitor being a first inhibitor,further comprising a step of administering a second inhibitor to thesubject, the second inhibitor being configured to selectively inhibit atleast one other channel that is not a member of the acid sensing ionchannel family.
 10. The method of claim 1, wherein the step ofadministering includes a step of administering an inhibitor configuredto inhibit ASIC1a channel activity at a concentration of inhibitor thatis at least about ten-fold less than for inhibition of another ASICfamily member.
 11. The method of claim 1, wherein the ischemia isstroke, and wherein the step of administering is performed at leastabout two hours after the onset of stroke on the ischemic subject toreduce injury induced by the stroke. 12-38. (canceled)